was the retail and HDTV will gladly make it appealing to the reference to "sharper" television images. On television we can now observe the move, however, tend to blur.
There's the one the deliberate, intentional blur : Thus, for example with the use of large single-sensor cameras a "desired cinematic" look, as it is associated with expensive Hollywood productions. A look at the better-off is due to the reduced depth of foreground and background against each other and are separated from each other. So far so good - even though this is sometimes exaggerated, but this design element can also be a great asset.
Then there are the random, arbitrary blur: When about the unimportant shelf in the background is represented crack sharp, the interviewees before but unfortunately remains unclear throughout the scene. This could happen even earlier time to time, especially when the host again frantically walked. But lately - at least the impression of the editors - the whole massive piles.
what's going on? Are the cameramen sloppy, knowledgeable poorer and indifferent as previously? This may in some cases perhaps even apply, but usually it is not certain. In many more cases, it is the equipment: it is shot in HD and it would therefore have the sharpness control in greater detail than before, but unfortunately with today in growing numbers used, inexpensive camcorders are often not in the viewfinder or on the Ausklappschirm really examined the focus and ensure reasonable doubt - despite many additional functions such as Focus Assist, Peaking, and the like. It looks easy on the Winz-umbrellas with their too low resolution is not that precisely because the focus now is where you want them.
And more often also chosen the wrong tool principle: Those who could not understand in principle that the temptation is great, with a foreign report or a document with "small set" flexible and unauffä ; llig to work? So, a bright DSLR packed and then shot on location with no additional light aperture and minimal depth of field.
Even very great master but can under these Conditions there is a satisfactory result be achieved if a spontaneous interview situation, the depth of the other person's not even the tip of the nose and reaches their eyes. The result is a blurred out Bilderbrei Geeiere and it does the cause no good when some of focus is important, filmed secret documents only half a line ...
This keeps the knowledge: It is indeed also a bathroom complete with a tooth brush, but if not at the end the result is, unfortunately, you have just wasted time only.
only hope that soon the reason rail strikes again and the audience is not always more are plagued with half-blurred features in the CSI-style: It does not fit, it does not work, it is in the eye.
Source:
